Artificial intelligence has moved from a side project handled by IT teams to a central business priority discussed at the board level. As that shift accelerated, a new executive title appeared on org charts across nearly every industry: the Chief AI Officer. If you have seen this title appear more frequently in job postings, news coverage, or company announcements and wondered exactly what the role involves, this guide breaks it down clearly, from the basics through to advanced career planning.

Written for anyone from complete beginners to seasoned professionals, this article explains what a Chief AI Officer actually does day to day, how the role differs from other technology executives, what skills it requires, and how someone might realistically work toward holding this title. For professionals who want a formal, structured way to prepare for this career path, a Certified Chief AI Officer (CAIO) credential offers a recognized starting point.

What Is a Chief AI Officer?

A Chief AI Officer, commonly abbreviated as CAIO, is a senior executive responsible for an organization's overall approach to artificial intelligence. Rather than focusing narrowly on building or maintaining technology, the role centers on connecting AI capabilities to actual business outcomes, including strategy, risk management, ethical use, and measurable return on investment.

In practice, the CAIO acts as a bridge between what AI can technically do and what a company actually needs it to accomplish. This means the role blends technical literacy with strategic thinking, since a Chief AI Officer must understand enough about machine learning and generative AI to make informed decisions, while also communicating clearly with non-technical executives, boards, and business unit leaders.

The role has grown remarkably quickly. According to a large-scale 2026 CEO survey, roughly three out of four organizations now report having a Chief AI Officer, a sharp increase from the prior year, when the figure sat closer to one in four. This rapid rise reflects how central AI adoption has become to competitive strategy across nearly every sector.

Why the Chief AI Officer Role Emerged

Understanding where this title came from helps explain why it exists in its current form. The role gained early formal recognition through a 2023 United States federal executive order focused on the safe and trustworthy development of artificial intelligence. A subsequent government memorandum required federal agencies to appoint a Chief AI Officer with clear responsibility for strengthening AI governance, encouraging responsible innovation, and managing risks associated with AI use.

This federal push helped accelerate adoption of the title within the private sector as well. As companies increasingly integrated AI into operations, customer experience, and product development, many discovered that responsibility for these decisions was scattered across multiple existing roles, with no single executive clearly accountable for AI outcomes as a whole. The Chief AI Officer position emerged specifically to close that accountability gap.

Core Responsibilities of a Chief AI Officer

While the exact scope varies by organization, most Chief AI Officer roles cluster around several consistent areas of responsibility.

AI Strategy and Roadmap

Setting a clear, business-aligned AI strategy sits at the center of the role. This involves identifying which AI initiatives deserve investment, distinguishing between exploratory pilot projects and efforts meant to scale across the organization, and ensuring AI spending connects directly to measurable business goals rather than technology for its own sake.

Governance, Risk, and Compliance

As regulation around artificial intelligence expands globally, governance has become one of the most consequential parts of the job. Chief AI Officers are typically responsible for ensuring AI systems meet legal and regulatory requirements, managing risks related to bias, data privacy, and system reliability, and establishing clear escalation paths for decisions that carry significant organizational risk.

Model and AI Lifecycle Management

Beyond initial deployment, AI systems require ongoing oversight. This includes monitoring model performance over time, managing how models are evaluated and updated, and ensuring that AI tools in production continue to perform reliably rather than degrading silently as data or business conditions change.

Responsible AI and Ethics

Ethical oversight has become a core, non-negotiable pillar of the role rather than an afterthought. Chief AI Officers typically develop and enforce guidelines addressing fairness, transparency, and accountability, working to ensure AI systems do not produce biased or harmful outcomes as they scale across the business.

Vendor and Platform Strategy

Most organizations do not build every AI capability from scratch. Chief AI Officers frequently evaluate and select AI vendors, platforms, and tools, balancing build-versus-buy decisions while ensuring chosen technologies align with the company's broader technical architecture and long-term strategy.

Driving AI Adoption Across the Organization

Perhaps the most underestimated part of the role involves organizational change management. Technology alone rarely transforms a business, since employees also need training, clear communication, and cultural buy-in to actually use new AI tools effectively. Chief AI Officers spend significant time building AI literacy across teams and helping different departments understand both AI's capabilities and its limitations.

Chief AI Officer vs. Other C-Suite Roles

Because the CAIO title is relatively new, it frequently overlaps with existing technology and data leadership roles, which can create confusion. Clarifying these distinctions helps explain why many organizations now maintain separate roles rather than folding AI responsibility into an existing position.

CAIO vs. CTO

A Chief Technology Officer typically owns the organization's entire technology stack, including infrastructure, engineering teams, and product development broadly. A Chief AI Officer, by contrast, focuses specifically on AI strategy, governance, and value delivery. In smaller organizations, these responsibilities sometimes combine under one executive, but as AI complexity grows, many companies choose to separate the two roles.

CAIO vs. CDO

A Chief Data Officer generally focuses on data quality, governance, and infrastructure, ensuring the organization has reliable, well-managed data available. A Chief AI Officer instead focuses on how that data gets used, specifically through AI models, use cases, and deployment decisions. Because AI depends heavily on good data, these two roles often collaborate closely, and some organizations combine them into a single Chief Data and AI Officer position.

CAIO vs. CIO

A Chief Information Officer traditionally manages internal IT systems, enterprise software, and operational technology efficiency. While AI increasingly touches nearly all of that infrastructure, the CIO's lens remains more focused on systems management than on strategic AI deployment specifically, which is where the Chief AI Officer's mandate concentrates instead.

Who Does the Chief AI Officer Report To?

Reporting structure varies across organizations, but a clear pattern has emerged. More than half of Chief AI Officers report directly to the CEO or the board of directors, which represents one of the highest direct-reporting rates among technology executive roles. This structure reflects how central AI has become to overall business strategy rather than remaining a purely operational or technical concern.

This direct access to top leadership also gives the role real influence, allowing Chief AI Officers to shape company-wide priorities rather than simply executing decisions made elsewhere. At the same time, the position typically requires close, ongoing collaboration with the CTO, CDO, CIO, chief information security officer, legal counsel, and individual business unit leaders, since AI initiatives rarely stay confined to a single department.

Skills Needed to Become a Chief AI Officer

Succeeding in this role requires a genuinely broad skill set, spanning both technical understanding and executive-level leadership ability.

Strong business acumen matters enormously, since a Chief AI Officer must understand revenue drivers, cost structures, and competitive dynamics well enough to prioritize AI investments effectively. Solid data governance knowledge helps build organizational trust, particularly as AI systems increasingly rely on sensitive or regulated data. AI literacy across the organization is equally essential, since part of the role involves helping non-technical teams understand what AI can realistically achieve and where its limitations lie.

Change leadership skills prove critical as well, since implementing AI often requires significant shifts in how teams work day to day, and cultural change rarely happens as quickly as technology itself evolves. Finally, continuous learning is non-negotiable, given how rapidly AI capabilities, tools, and best practices continue to shift year over year.

Chief AI Officer Salary and Compensation

Compensation for this role has grown substantially as demand has intensified. Reported average salaries for Chief AI Officers in the United States generally fall in the range of $250,000 to $400,000 at growth-stage companies, climbing to $300,000 to $500,000 at mid-market organizations, and reaching $400,000 to well over $1,000,000 at large enterprises when factoring in bonuses and equity.

Total compensation packages, including base salary, performance bonuses, and long-term incentives, frequently exceed $750,000 at large enterprises and can surpass $1,000,000 at the very largest global companies. This wide range reflects significant variation in company size, industry, geographic location, and the actual scope of authority granted to the role, since a Chief AI Officer with a genuine budget and clear executive mandate commands very different compensation than one functioning primarily as a governance figurehead.

Industries Hiring Chief AI Officers Fastest

While Chief AI Officer roles now appear across nearly every sector, certain industries have moved particularly quickly. Healthcare, financial services, and government organizations show especially strong demand, largely driven by heavy regulatory requirements and AI compliance obligations specific to these fields. Technology companies also continue hiring aggressively, given how directly AI capability affects their core competitive position.

This industry pattern makes sense when considering the underlying pressures driving CAIO adoption. Sectors facing the strictest regulatory scrutiny around data use, algorithmic decision-making, and consumer protection naturally feel the most urgent need for dedicated executive oversight of AI risk and governance.

Challenges Chief AI Officers Face

Despite growing recognition, the role is not without significant difficulty. One persistent challenge involves role ambiguity, since overlapping responsibilities with the CTO, CDO, and CIO can create confusion about who actually owns specific AI decisions if boundaries are not clearly defined from the start.

Another common difficulty involves securing real authority rather than symbolic responsibility. A Chief AI Officer without a dedicated budget, a clear mandate spanning multiple business units, and a defined escalation path to the executive board risks becoming little more than an advisory figure with a prestigious title but limited actual influence. Organizations serious about AI transformation typically address this by granting real decision-making power alongside the title itself.

Finally, balancing innovation against risk management remains an ongoing tension throughout the role. Moving too cautiously risks falling behind competitors, while moving too aggressively without adequate governance can expose the organization to significant reputational, legal, or ethical risk.

Building the Path Toward Becoming a Chief AI Officer

For professionals aiming toward this career path, structured learning provides a far more reliable foundation than piecing together knowledge informally. Since the role demands both technical fluency and strategic business judgment, formal education specifically focused on artificial intelligence concepts helps bridge that gap effectively.

Exploring broader Artificial Intelligence Certifications early in a career path provides the conceptual grounding needed to later engage credibly with technical teams, evaluate AI vendors, and make informed governance decisions, all core parts of the CAIO mandate. Rather than treating technical knowledge and business leadership as separate tracks, combining both through structured certification tends to produce stronger, more well-rounded candidates for future AI leadership roles.

Building Technology Skills From an Early Age

The growing importance of AI leadership also highlights a broader need to develop technology literacy well before professionals reach the workplace. Skills such as programming, computational thinking, cybersecurity, robotics, and AI fundamentals can help younger learners understand how emerging technologies work while strengthening the problem-solving abilities that future technical and leadership roles will increasingly require.

Designed to encourage technology learning among school students, the World Tech Olympiad (WTO) brings together participants from Class 2 to Class 12 through different technology-focused challenges. Its areas include robotics, AI, programming, computational thinking, and cybersecurity, with competition levels structured to suit different age groups and abilities.

The Olympiad supports participation through separate routes for families and educational institutions. Parents can enroll their children directly, while schools can register as institutions and facilitate participation for students who meet the eligibility requirements.

Is Every Company Ready for a Chief AI Officer?

Not every organization needs a dedicated, full-time Chief AI Officer immediately. Smaller companies often start by assigning AI strategy, governance, and adoption responsibilities to an existing leader, frequently the CTO, COO, or a senior product executive, before the scope becomes large enough to justify a standalone hire.

That said, the underlying functions the role covers, including AI strategy, governance, cross-functional coordination, and organization-wide AI literacy, matter at nearly any company size. As AI adoption deepens and regulatory requirements expand, many organizations eventually find that these responsibilities outgrow what a part-time or secondary assignment can adequately handle, prompting the shift toward a dedicated executive role.

The Future of the Chief AI Officer Role

Whether the Chief AI Officer title becomes a permanent fixture of the corporate world or eventually fades as AI becomes as commonplace as the internet remains genuinely uncertain. Some industry observers believe the role's complexity justifies permanent, dedicated leadership similar to established C-suite functions. Others suggest the title may prove transitional, potentially becoming unnecessary once AI integration matures across every business function the way internet-specific leadership roles largely did decades ago.

What seems clear for now is that demand continues climbing sharply, regulatory pressure keeps intensifying globally, and organizations without clear AI accountability increasingly struggle to move from scattered pilot projects toward reliable, governed AI systems that actually deliver measurable business value.

Learning Path: From AI Fundamentals to Chief AI Officer Readiness

For professionals serious about pursuing this career path, a structured, sequential approach to learning offers the clearest route toward genuine readiness.

Begin by building broad technical grounding through general Tech Certification options, which establish foundational literacy across emerging technology domains relevant to modern AI leadership. From there, deepen specialized knowledge through Artificial Intelligence Certifications focused specifically on machine learning, generative AI, and related concepts central to the CAIO mandate.

Once this technical foundation is solid, professionals interested in how AI increasingly intersects with blockchain, Web3, and other frontier technologies can explore Deep Tech Certification options to build a broader, forward-looking technology perspective. Finally, formalizing this entire learning journey through a Certified Chief AI Officer (CAIO) credential ties technical knowledge directly to the strategic, governance, and leadership skills the role specifically demands.

Following this progression, from broad technology literacy, to specialized AI knowledge, to frontier technology awareness, to formal executive-level certification, offers a practical, well-rounded path toward genuine Chief AI Officer readiness rather than fragmented, disconnected learning.

Conclusion

The Chief AI Officer has rapidly become one of the most consequential roles in the modern C-suite, responsible for connecting artificial intelligence capability to real business strategy, governance, and measurable value. The role demands a genuinely rare combination of technical literacy, ethical judgment, and executive leadership skill, and its rapid growth over the past two years shows no clear signs of slowing down.

For professionals aiming to build a career toward this position, combining broad technical education with focused, structured learning offers the clearest path forward. Pursuing a Chief AI Officer career track through a recognized Certified Chief AI Officer (CAIO) credential provides both the practical knowledge and the professional validation needed to compete for this fast-growing, high-impact executive role.

FAQs

1. What does a Chief AI Officer do?

A Chief AI Officer (CAIO) is a senior executive responsible for shaping and leading an organization’s artificial intelligence strategy. The role typically connects AI investments with business objectives, oversees AI governance, identifies high-value use cases, manages AI-related risks, and helps different departments adopt AI responsibly.

Rather than simply buying AI tools because everyone else has apparently decided every workflow needs a chatbot, the CAIO determines where AI can create measurable value and how it should be deployed safely and effectively.

2. What is a Chief AI Officer?

A Chief AI Officer is an executive who provides organization-wide leadership for artificial intelligence. The CAIO may oversee AI strategy, generative AI programs, machine learning initiatives, governance frameworks, data and model policies, AI talent, vendor relationships, and adoption.

The exact scope varies by organization. In some companies, the CAIO manages a dedicated AI organization. In others, the role coordinates AI initiatives across technology, data, security, legal, risk, operations, and individual business units.

3. Why are companies hiring Chief AI Officers?

Companies are hiring Chief AI Officers because AI increasingly affects multiple areas of business simultaneously, including technology, operations, customer experience, workforce productivity, cybersecurity, compliance, product development, and competitive strategy.

Without centralized leadership, departments may independently purchase tools, build overlapping AI systems, expose sensitive information, or pursue projects with little measurable value.

A CAIO provides coordination and helps leadership decide where AI should be used, how much to invest, what risks must be controlled, and how success will be measured.

4. What are the main responsibilities of a Chief AI Officer?

A Chief AI Officer typically develops the enterprise AI strategy and translates it into an actionable portfolio of initiatives. Responsibilities can include identifying AI opportunities, prioritizing projects, establishing governance, selecting technology platforms, overseeing model risk, developing AI talent, managing vendors, and measuring business impact.

The CAIO also works with senior leadership to determine how AI affects products, operations, employees, customers, and long-term competitive positioning.

The job is therefore considerably broader than knowing which large language model scored highest on this month’s benchmark.

5. How does a Chief AI Officer develop an AI strategy?

A CAIO normally begins by examining the organization’s business strategy, operational problems, available data, technology capabilities, regulatory environment, and competitive position.

Potential AI opportunities are then evaluated according to factors such as business value, feasibility, data readiness, implementation cost, risk, scalability, and time to value.

The resulting strategy should define where AI will create value, what capabilities must be developed, which initiatives receive priority, how risks will be governed, and which metrics leadership will use to evaluate progress.

6. What role does a Chief AI Officer play in generative AI?

Generative AI has become an important part of many CAIO portfolios because it can support activities such as content creation, software development, research, customer service, knowledge retrieval, document processing, and employee productivity.

The CAIO helps determine which generative AI use cases are appropriate and what safeguards they require.

This can involve policies for sensitive data, human review, hallucination risk, intellectual property, model selection, access controls, evaluation, monitoring, and acceptable use.

The goal is useful adoption rather than distributing AI accounts and hoping corporate evolution handles the details.

7. Is a Chief AI Officer responsible for AI governance?

AI governance is commonly a major responsibility of the Chief AI Officer, although governance is usually shared with functions such as legal, compliance, privacy, cybersecurity, risk management, data governance, and internal audit.

The CAIO may establish frameworks for classifying AI systems according to risk, documenting models, approving use cases, evaluating vendors, monitoring performance, managing incidents, and defining human oversight.

Effective governance should enable responsible AI adoption rather than simply adding enough approval stages to make employees create unofficial workarounds.

8. How does a Chief AI Officer manage AI risks?

A CAIO helps establish processes for identifying, assessing, mitigating, and monitoring AI risks throughout the system lifecycle.

Important risks can include inaccurate outputs, bias, privacy violations, security vulnerabilities, data leakage, regulatory non-compliance, intellectual-property concerns, model drift, excessive automation, and inappropriate reliance on AI-generated decisions.

Higher-risk applications generally require stronger evaluation, documentation, monitoring, access controls, and human oversight than low-risk productivity tools.

AI risk management therefore needs to be proportional to the potential consequences of failure.

9. What is the difference between a Chief AI Officer and a Chief Technology Officer?

A Chief Technology Officer (CTO) typically has broader responsibility for technology strategy, engineering, platforms, architecture, and technical innovation.

A Chief AI Officer focuses specifically on AI strategy, adoption, governance, capabilities, and business value.

The roles can overlap significantly. A CTO may oversee AI engineering infrastructure while the CAIO determines enterprise AI priorities and governance.

In smaller organizations, appointing separate executives may be unnecessary. Companies are allowed to solve coordination problems without automatically creating another C-suite acronym.

10. What is the difference between a Chief AI Officer and a Chief Data Officer?

A Chief Data Officer (CDO) generally focuses on data strategy, governance, quality, accessibility, architecture, analytics, and organizational data capabilities.

A Chief AI Officer focuses on converting data, models, AI platforms, and organizational capabilities into AI-powered business outcomes.

The two roles are closely connected because effective AI depends heavily on reliable and appropriately governed data.

In some organizations, AI responsibilities sit under the CDO. In others, the CAIO and CDO operate as separate executives with clearly defined responsibilities.

11. Does a Chief AI Officer need to be a technical expert?

A CAIO needs enough technical knowledge to understand AI capabilities, limitations, architecture choices, evaluation methods, data requirements, security considerations, and model risks. However, the role generally requires much more than technical expertise.

Strong CAIOs also need business strategy, financial judgment, leadership, governance, communication, change management, and organizational design skills.

They must be able to communicate with AI engineers in one meeting and explain investment priorities, risks, and expected returns to the board in another.

Being able to train a neural network personally is considerably less useful if nobody can explain why the organization needs it.

12. What skills does a Chief AI Officer need?

A Chief AI Officer typically needs a combination of AI literacy, strategic thinking, business acumen, data understanding, technology leadership, governance knowledge, risk management, financial analysis, communication, and change leadership.

The CAIO should understand machine learning, generative AI, foundation models, AI agents, data infrastructure, model evaluation, and responsible AI concepts at an executive decision-making level.

Equally important is the ability to prioritize. AI creates a nearly unlimited supply of possible projects, while organizations continue to suffer from the inconvenient limitation of finite money and people.

13. Who does the Chief AI Officer report to?

The reporting structure varies according to the organization’s size, industry, strategy, and existing executive structure.

A Chief AI Officer may report directly to the CEO or operate under another executive such as the CTO, CIO, Chief Digital Officer, or Chief Data Officer.

Direct CEO reporting may make sense when AI represents a major enterprise-wide strategic transformation. A technology reporting line may work when AI is primarily part of a broader technology organization.

What matters most is whether the CAIO has sufficient authority to coordinate decisions across business and functional boundaries.

14. What teams report to a Chief AI Officer?

Depending on the organization, a CAIO may oversee teams involved in AI engineering, machine learning, generative AI, data science, AI product management, AI governance, model evaluation, responsible AI, automation, and AI enablement.

Some organizations use a centralized AI Center of Excellence, while others distribute AI specialists across business units.

A hybrid model is also common, with a central team defining platforms, governance, standards, and shared capabilities while business teams develop domain-specific applications.

The right structure depends on organizational scale and AI maturity.

15. How does a Chief AI Officer choose AI use cases?

A CAIO should prioritize use cases based on business value rather than technological novelty.

Potential initiatives can be assessed according to expected revenue impact, cost reduction, productivity gains, customer value, strategic importance, implementation difficulty, data availability, risk, and scalability.

For example, automating a high-volume document-review process may create more measurable value than developing an elaborate AI demonstration that photographs beautifully at executive meetings.

Strong portfolios usually combine quick wins with larger strategic initiatives that build long-term AI capability.

16. How does a Chief AI Officer measure AI ROI?

A CAIO should establish measurable baselines before major AI implementations and compare them with post-deployment results.

Relevant metrics may include cost savings, employee hours saved, cycle-time reduction, revenue growth, conversion rates, customer satisfaction, defect reduction, automation rates, model accuracy, adoption, and risk-adjusted business impact.

A simplified calculation can be expressed as:

AI ROI = (AI Benefits − AI Costs) ÷ AI Costs × 100

Costs should include more than model subscriptions. Infrastructure, integration, data preparation, security, governance, training, monitoring, and ongoing operations also consume resources, despite their traditional reluctance to appear in exciting AI business cases.

17. How does a Chief AI Officer prepare employees for AI adoption?

Successful AI transformation requires changes in skills and working practices, not merely technology deployment.

The CAIO may work with HR and business leaders to develop AI literacy programs, role-specific training, acceptable-use guidance, workflow redesign, communities of practice, and reskilling initiatives.

Employees should understand where AI can assist them, when outputs require verification, what information should not be entered into particular systems, and when human judgment remains necessary.

The objective should be competent adoption rather than maximizing the number of employees who have technically logged into an AI platform.

18. How does a Chief AI Officer work with the CEO and board?

The CAIO helps senior leadership understand the strategic opportunities, investments, limitations, and risks associated with AI.

Board-level discussions may cover AI strategy, competitive developments, major investments, governance, cybersecurity, regulatory exposure, workforce implications, high-risk applications, and performance against expected business outcomes.

A strong CAIO translates technical developments into business consequences.

Executives generally do not need another presentation explaining transformer architecture. They need to understand what AI changes for the organization, what it will cost, what can go wrong, and what decisions they need to make.

19. Does every company need a Chief AI Officer?

No. Not every organization needs a dedicated Chief AI Officer.

Large organizations with extensive AI investments, complex regulatory obligations, numerous AI use cases, or significant cross-functional coordination needs may benefit from a dedicated CAIO.

Smaller organizations may be better served by assigning clear AI responsibility to an existing CTO, CIO, CDO, digital leader, or senior business executive.

The important requirement is not the title. It is having clear ownership for AI strategy, investment, governance, adoption, risk, and measurable business outcomes.

Creating an executive position without defining those responsibilities merely gives organizational ambiguity a more expensive office.

20. What does a successful Chief AI Officer look like in practice?

A successful Chief AI Officer connects AI technology with business strategy, governance, people, and measurable outcomes.

The role can be understood through a practical leadership model:

BUSINESS STRATEGY

Identify where AI can materially improve competitive and operational performance.

↓

AI OPPORTUNITY PORTFOLIO

Prioritize high-value use cases based on value, feasibility, data readiness, cost, and risk.

↓

DATA AND TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION

Ensure appropriate models, platforms, infrastructure, integrations, security, and data capabilities are available.

↓

AI GOVERNANCE

Establish policies, risk classifications, evaluation requirements, human oversight, documentation, monitoring, and accountability.

↓

IMPLEMENTATION

Move promising ideas from experiments into reliable production systems and redesigned business workflows.

↓

WORKFORCE ADOPTION

Develop AI literacy, role-specific skills, operating procedures, and change-management programs.

↓

MEASUREMENT

Track adoption, quality, productivity, customer outcomes, financial benefits, and risk indicators.

↓

SCALE

Expand successful AI capabilities across appropriate parts of the organization while continuously monitoring performance and risk.

The CAIO’s job is therefore not simply to “lead AI.” That phrase is pleasantly impressive and almost completely useless until translated into responsibilities.

The practical mandate is to answer questions such as:

Where can AI create meaningful business value?
Which AI investments should receive priority?
What data and technology capabilities are required?
Which applications create unacceptable or manageable risks?
How should AI systems be evaluated before deployment?
How will employees use AI effectively and responsibly?
How will the organization measure ROI?
Who remains accountable when AI influences a business decision?

A strong Chief AI Officer ultimately creates a connection between:

AI Capability → Business Use Case → Responsible Deployment → Employee Adoption → Measurable Value → Scalable Advantage

That is what separates a meaningful CAIO function from an organization merely accumulating AI pilots, vendor subscriptions, and executive presentations containing glowing robot graphics.

The title may be new. The executive obligation is ancient: invest intelligently, manage risk, create measurable value, and make sure somebody is actually accountable for the result.